WHAT'S HOT?

Basic Instinct 2 (2006)

Basic Instinct 2 Poster

Movie Info


Genre

Thriller, Mystery

Release Date

March 31, 2006

MPAA Rating

R

Duration

113 min.

Production Budget

$70 millions

Studio

Columbia Pictures

Official Site

click here

REVIEWS RATE:  Critics  Not quite bad, but it's not recommended either.    Readers  1 of 5 [Rate It]

Cast and Crew


Director

Michael Caton-Jones

Producer

Moritz Borman, Mario Kassar, Andrew G. Vajna

Screenwriter

Leora Barish, Henry Bean

Starring

Movie Story


In the sexy and sleek psychological thriller "Basic Instinct 2," after re-locating from San Francisco to London, best-selling novelist Catherine Trammell (Sharon Stone) once again finds herself on the wrong side of the law.

Dr. Michael Glass (David Morrissey), a respected London criminal psychiatrist, is brought in by Scotland Yard detective Roy Washburn (David Thewlis) to perform a psychiatric profile and evaluation of Tramell following the myserious death of a top sports star. Physically drawn to Tramell and mentally intrigued by her, Glass, against the advice of his mentor, Dr. Milena Gardosh (Charlotte Rampling), is quickly sucked into her web of lies and seduction. The professional boundaries between Glass and Tramell are obliterated when she uncovers his basic instincts. A deadly battle of wits ensues, climaxing as Glass faces a choice that will change both of their lives forever.

Movie Stills (4 photos)


Sharon Stone as Catherine Tramell in Sony Pictures Entertainment's Basic Instinct 2 (2006)
Sharon Stone as Catherine Tramell in Sony Pictures Entertainment's Basic Instinct 2 (2006)

Reader's Reviews


Screen Name
Rate This Movie
Comment
 

Sfy8TX

posted by Kwtalrzd on Jul 13, 2009
 
 

PREMIERE PHOTO

Sharon Stone
Sony Pictures' premiere of "Basic Instinct 2: Risk Addiction"
Mar 27, 2006
Sharon Stone
Sony Pictures' premiere of "Basic Instinct 2: Risk Addiction"
Mar 27, 2006

Related News


MOVIE REVIEWS BY CRITICS

“..as absurd as a teen slasher flick..”
by Ed Blank [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review]
“..unable to involve, entertain, or titillate..”
by James Berardinelli [ReelViews]
“..a flawed but enjoyably trashy sequel that's worth seeing for curiosity value alone..”
by Matthew Turner [ViewLondon]