Mission: Impossible 3 Reviews

Mission: Impossible 3


Genre :

Action, Adventure

Release Date :

May 05, 2006

MPAA Rating :


Director :

J.J. Abrams

Starring :

Tom Cruise, Ving Rhames, Simon Pegg, Laurence Fishburne, Jonathan Rhys Meyers, Michelle Monaghan, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Keri Russell, Maggie Q

REVIEWS RATE:  Critics  Nothing's perfect, but it's worth seeing.    Readers  5 of 5 [Rate It]

2.5 of 4

“..Uneven but lively, the film suffers from many of the usual big-budget action movie drawbacks: Too many endings, too many machine guns and missile attacks..”
by Michael Phillips [Chicago Tribune]
4 of 5

“..significantly richer in terms of character development than either of its predecessors..”
by David Mercier [FilmJudge]
3 of 5

“..On the build Mission 3 is urgent and addictive, but when closing the deal it's contrived and predictable..”
by Ian Nathan [Empire Magazine [UK]]
3 of 5

“..most entertaining of the Mish Iposs franchise..”
by Paul Arendt [BBC Films]
2.5 of 4

“..failed in its mission of pure entertainment..”
by James Berardinelli [ReelViews]
4 of 5

“..An expertly made guilty-pleasure blockbuster..”
by Rich Cline [Shadows on the Wall]
4 of 5

“..a step forward for the franchise..”
by Robert Hanks [The Independent]
8 of 10

“..a great start for the summer films of 2006..”
by Scott Chitwood [Comingsoon]
4.5 of 5

“..a gratifyingly clever, booby-trapped thriller that has enough fun and imagination..”
by Owen Gleiberman [Entertainment Weekly]
4.5 of 5
Reviewed by Keith Phipps [The Onion A.V. Club]
4 of 5
Reviewed by Erik Childress [eFilmCritic]
4 of 5
Reviewed by Joe Utichi [FilmFocus]
3.5 of 5
Reviewed by Bill Muller [The Arizona Republic]
3.5 of 5
Reviewed by Marc Savlov [Austin Chronicle]
3.5 of 5
Reviewed by [E! Online]
3 of 4
Reviewed by Ed Blank [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review]
3 of 4
Reviewed by Jami Bernard [New York Daily News]
2.5 of 4
Reviewed by Nick Schager [Slant Magazine]
2.5 of 5
Reviewed by Cheryl Scheuer [Boxoffice Magazine]
2.5 of 4
Reviewed by Wesley Morris [Boston Globe]
2.5 of 4
Reviewed by Pam Grady [Reel]
2.5 of 5
Reviewed by Joe Williams [St. Louis Post-Dispatch]
2 of 5
Reviewed by Andrea Chase [Killer Movie Reviews]
1.5 of 5
Reviewed by Laurence Washington [Black Flix]
Reviewed by Sandra Hall [The Sydney Morning Herald]
Reviewed by Michael Agger [Slate]
Reviewed by MaryAnn Johanson [The Flick Filosopher]
Reviewed by Todd McCarthy [Variety]
Reviewed by Todd McCarthy [Variety]
Reviewed by Steve Schneider [Orlando Weekly]
Reviewed by Sheri Linden [The Hollywood Reporter]

Reader's Reviews

Screen Name
Rate This Movie
Please Enter   



“..Home doesn't stand out as fresh or particularly funny. There are stretches that feel flat..”
by Linda Barnard [Toronto Star]


“..Hart and Ferrell may not be Pryor and Wilder, but they score several laughs in this slim comedy..”
by Rafer Guzman [Newsday]


“..lazy and contrived retread can ever hope to be..”
by Rodrigo Perez [The Playlist]


“..Ned Rifle is top notch quirk and really exciting to watch..”
by Mike Shutt [Rope of Silicon]


“..while the story falls a bit into melodrama, that can't chop away at the solid drama the stars and director build beautifully..”
by Joe Neumaier [NY Daily News]


“..in While We're Young, writer-director Noah Baumbach gets hold of a good satirical premise and does halfway well by it, maybe even two-thirds..”
by David Edelstein [Vulture]


“..it's all very familiar in that Blair Witch kind of way, with neither the characters nor situations proving remotely interesting..”
by Frank Scheck [Hollywood Reporter]


“..the way director Kornel Mundruczo got Body and Luke to run the gamut of emotions from face-licking adorableness to teeth-baring killers baying for blood is genuinely impressive..”
by Cath Clarke [Time Out London]


“..a nearly laughless comedy that doesn't do its writer/director/stars any favors..”
by Roger Moore [Movienation]


“..has some recognizable stars, but they are trapped in a slim story padded with lots and lots of flesh-eating..”
by Neil Genzlinger [NY Times]