WHAT'S HOT?
Home > Movie > W > Water for Elephants > Reviews

Water for Elephants Reviews

Water for Elephants

Overview


Genre :

Drama, Romance

Release Date :

April 22, 2011

MPAA Rating :

PG-13

Director :

Francis Lawrence

Starring :

Reese Witherspoon, Robert Pattinson, Christoph Waltz, Paul Schneider, Jim Norton, Hal Holbrook, James Frain, Mark Povinelli, Richard Brake, Ken Foree

REVIEWS RATE:  Critics  Nothing's perfect, but it's worth seeing.    Readers  5 of 5 [Rate It]

“..the vital spark that would have made the drama truly compelling on the screen is missing..”
by Todd McCarthy [Hollywood Reporter]
5 of 5

“..the unexpectedly good film version of "Water for Elephants" elevates pure corn to a completely satisfying realm of romantic melodrama..”
by Michael Phillips [Chicago Tribune]
2 of 4

“..the movie strips away both the grand weirdness of the circus and the dire desolation of the depression..”
by Wesley Morris [Boston Globe]
“..that movie left you feeling as if you'd enjoyed at least one roll in the sawdust..”
by Stephen Holden [NY Times]
3 of 4

“..steamy and sexy with a smack of sadism..”
by Carrie Rickey [Philadelphia Inquirer]
2 of 4

“..it's not a total washout, and its unromantic view of circus life, especially back then, is probably close to the mark..”
by Roger Moore [Orlando Sentinel]
Review rate : C

“..it's a tastefully managed, passionless melodrama, full of brooding looks and reasonably sweet moments..”
by Tasha Robinson [AV Club]
“..is so painfully mediocre..”
2.5 of 4

“..is mildly entertaining, though the best performances come not from the stars, but the supporting players..”
by Claudia Puig [USA Today]
“..is endlessly watchable, thanks mainly to Waltz..”
by Mick LaSalle [San Fransisco Chronicle]
“..if the circus is a hierarchical pyramid, August is at the very top..”
by Kenneth Turan [LA Times]
2 of 4

“..buildups like that are hard to justify, and Water for Elephants fails to do so, but only on an emotional level..”
by Peter Howell [Toronto Star]
2 of 5

“..add romantic chemistry to the list of things that fall flat in the film, alongside dialogue and acting..”
by Bill Goodykoontz [Arizona Republic]

Reader's Reviews


Screen Name
Rate This Movie
Please Enter   
Comment
 
 
 
RSS
FB
Twitter

LATEST REVIEWS

MACBETH :

“..fearsomely visceral and impeccably performed, it's a brisk, bracing update, even as it remains exquisitely in period..”
by Guy Lodge [Variety]

INSIDE OUT :

“..delightfully inventive, funny and touching and, surreptitiously, a great way of helping kids get a handle on all those inexplicable feelings..”
by David Sexton [This is London]

SICARIO :

“..Villeneuve handles conventional action sequences terrifically well..”
by Peter Bradshaw [The Guardian]

SEA OF TREES :

“..from the cloying, ever-present score to the complete lack of narrative momentum, it all adds up to a film that's easily Van Sant's worst..”
by Oliver Lyttelton [The Playlist]

TOMORROWLAND :

“..the movie can conjure up futuristic images, but the story is nothing we haven't seen before...”
by Stephanie Merry [Washington Post]

POLTERGEIST :

“..the spirits may have been willing with Poltergeist but the movie is weak..”
by Linda Barnard [Toronto Star]

WHEN MARNIE WAS THERE :

“..will make fans of the Japanese animation studio yearn for when Hayao Miyazaki was there. The now-retired maestro of the form had a sense of poetry and lyricism that's sadly missing here..”
by Joe Neumaier [NY Daily News]

THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE III :

“..more depravity, more terrible acting..”
by Chris Nashawaty [Entertainment Weekly]

CHOCOLATE CITY :

“..a black riff on a certain stripper movie smash..”
by Roger Moore [Tribune News Service]

ALOFT :

“..the rest of it - the healer, the journalist, the falcons - is just a thick, tedious layer of frost on the window..”
by Katharine Pushkar [NY Daily News]