WHAT'S HOT?
Home > Movie > W > Water for Elephants > Reviews

Water for Elephants Reviews

Water for Elephants

Overview


Genre :

Drama, Romance

Release Date :

April 22, 2011

MPAA Rating :

PG-13

Director :

Francis Lawrence

Starring :

Reese Witherspoon, Robert Pattinson, Christoph Waltz, Paul Schneider, Jim Norton, Hal Holbrook, James Frain, Mark Povinelli, Richard Brake, Ken Foree

REVIEWS RATE:  Critics  Nothing's perfect, but it's worth seeing.    Readers  5 of 5 [Rate It]

“..the vital spark that would have made the drama truly compelling on the screen is missing..”
by Todd McCarthy [Hollywood Reporter]
5 of 5

“..the unexpectedly good film version of "Water for Elephants" elevates pure corn to a completely satisfying realm of romantic melodrama..”
by Michael Phillips [Chicago Tribune]
2 of 4

“..the movie strips away both the grand weirdness of the circus and the dire desolation of the depression..”
by Wesley Morris [Boston Globe]
“..that movie left you feeling as if you'd enjoyed at least one roll in the sawdust..”
by Stephen Holden [NY Times]
3 of 4

“..steamy and sexy with a smack of sadism..”
by Carrie Rickey [Philadelphia Inquirer]
2 of 4

“..it's not a total washout, and its unromantic view of circus life, especially back then, is probably close to the mark..”
by Roger Moore [Orlando Sentinel]
Review rate : C

“..it's a tastefully managed, passionless melodrama, full of brooding looks and reasonably sweet moments..”
by Tasha Robinson [AV Club]
“..is so painfully mediocre..”
2.5 of 4

“..is mildly entertaining, though the best performances come not from the stars, but the supporting players..”
by Claudia Puig [USA Today]
“..is endlessly watchable, thanks mainly to Waltz..”
by Mick LaSalle [San Fransisco Chronicle]
“..if the circus is a hierarchical pyramid, August is at the very top..”
by Kenneth Turan [LA Times]
2 of 4

“..buildups like that are hard to justify, and Water for Elephants fails to do so, but only on an emotional level..”
by Peter Howell [Toronto Star]
2 of 5

“..add romantic chemistry to the list of things that fall flat in the film, alongside dialogue and acting..”
by Bill Goodykoontz [Arizona Republic]

Reader's Reviews


Screen Name
Rate This Movie
Please Enter   
Comment
 
 
 
RSS
FB
Twitter

LATEST REVIEWS

45 YEARS :

“..it is supremely intelligent and moving and Rampling and Courtenay are superb..”
by Peter Bradshaw [The Guardian]

A WALK IN THE WOODS :

“..A Walk in the Woods is a jolly good time, sparking dozens of chuckles and a few strong laughs. Nothing special cinematically, it still provides a welcome showcase for wonderful star..”
by Todd McCarthy [Hollywood Reporter]

WAR ROOM :

“..are so heavy on broad pulpit pounding that it's challenging to get swept along by the story's message..”
by Tom Russo [Boston Globe]

ZIPPER :

“..on all counts, "Zipper" comes up short..”
by Katharine Pushkar [NY Daily News]

7 CHINESE BROTHERS :

“..feels like an homage to the early work of Wes Anderson with its plinky soundtrack, solipsistic banter and emphasis on uniforms..”
by Sara Stewart [New York Post]

TURBO KID :

“..it feels like amateur hour, but for fans of low-rent thrills it's kind of fun..”
by Soren Andersen [Seattle Times]

WHEN ANIMALS DREAM :

“..rich with tone but otherwise lacking bite..”
by Jordan Hoffman [NY Daily News]

POD :

“..a highly effective tale of terror that does a nice job of setting an unsettling tone from the onset and very rarely lets up until the film's conclusion..”
by Heather Wixson [Dailydead]

#LUCKY NUMBER :

“..obviously "#Lucky Number" will not appeal to everyone but for those that do find it entertaining, they will not be disappointed..”
by James McDonald [Irish Film Critic]

Z FOR ZACHARIAH :

“..the dramatic tension considerably less, in a movie that feels stranded somewhere between serious artistic ambition and the dystopian franchise-building of "The Hunger Games," "Divergent," et al..”
by Scott Foundas [Variety]