Underworld: Awakening Reviews

  • Underworld: Awakening
    • Genre : Action, Fantasy, Thriller
    • Release Date :
    • MPAA Rating : R
    • Duration : 88 minute(s)
    • Production Budget : -
    • Studio : Screen Gems
    • Official Site : http://www.entertheunderworld.com/
    • Reviews Rate
      Nothing's perfect, but it's worth seeing.

    • Readers Rate
      4 of 5

Movie Reviews

  • the plot was a little disappointing. There wasn't really much of a story, or it wasn't executed very well
    3 of 5 by Adrian Foong [Venusbuzz.com ]
  • the film's handful of confusingly blocked, excessively noisy, and common-sense-deprived set pieces, not a single image can be described as inspired
    by Rob Humanick [Slant Magazine ]
  • the digital effects this time around are far better than what we've experienced previously in the series
    3.5 of 5 by Thehorrorchick [Dread Central ]
  • the action sequences, while abundant, are nothing more than decent
    2 of 5 by Jim Vejvoda [IGN Movies ]
  • the action is defined by whirligig balletics and ample gushes of violence
    by Nick Pinkerton [Village Voice ]
  • that boredom extends outward to encompass the entire film
    by Rob Vaux [Mania.com ]
  • so drab and dour that whatever junky charm they might have possessed is slowly
    by Peter Sobczynski [eFilmCritic.com ]
  • no unanswered puzzles in the plot make it an easy watch
    by Renuka Vyavahare [The Times of India ]
  • more aggressively violent and thankfully less mythology-driven than previous installments
    by Frank Scheck [Hollywood Reporter ]
  • merely a would-be videogame adventure on the big screen, with 3-D added to boost ticket prices and make the murky, dark scenes seem even more muddy
    by Joe Neumaier [New York Daily News ]
  • it's big, loud and not especially clever
    2 of 5 by Daniel Bettridge [Sky Movies ]
  • "Underworld Awakening" is one of the best
    by Richard Corliss [TIME Magazine ]

Reader's Reviews





if ($layoutType == 'mobile') { mb_bottomframe($kanal, $htmlfile, $brstatus); } ?>