WHAT'S HOT?

Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith Reviews

Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith

Overview


Genre :

Adventure

Release Date :

May 19, 2005

MPAA Rating :

PG-13

Director :

George Lucas

Starring :

Ewan McGregor, Natalie Portman, Hayden Christensen, Christopher Lee, Samuel L. Jackson, Frank Oz, Ian McDiarmid

REVIEWS RATE:  Critics  Go! Watch this movie. You'll regret if not seeing it.    Readers  5 of 5 [Rate It]

7 of 10

“..Visually stunning and more moments of interest than the previous two prequels..”
by Paul Boschen [Movie Marshal]
3.5 of 4

“..utterly mesmerizing, building magnificently to a coda setting up all the events in the original trilogy..”
by Sara M. Fetters [MovieFreak]
8 of 10

“..The story effortlessly enthralls you within its mythology and dramatic-emotional roller coaster...”
by Julian Boyance [Movie-Vault]
4 of 4

“..the scariest, most exciting, most visually prodigious of the sextet..”
by Michael Wilmington [Chicago Tribune]
4 of 4

“..the first must-see movie of the year...”
by David Edwards [London Daily Mirror]
3.5 of 4

“..the best of the most recent batch of three...”
by Annlee Ellingson [Boxoffice Magazine]
3 of 4

“..the best of George Lucas' prequels..”
by Jeff Vice [Deseret News, Salt Lake City]
3.5 of 4

“..the best installment in the Star Wars series since 1980's The Empire Strikes Back...”
by James Berardinelli [ReelViews]
4 of 5

“..strings a complex plot onto a framework of practically non-stop action...”
by Paul Arendt [BBC Films]
4 of 5

“..Sith succeeds in providing a satisfying ending to the films..”
by Chris Gore [Film Threat, Hollywood's Indie Voice]
8 of 10

“..probably the best of the three prequels...”
by Scott Chitwood [Comingsoon]
3.5 of 4

“..not only the best of the prequels but of the entire trilogy..”
by David Nusair [Reel Film Reviews]
4 of 5

“..it delivers with such awe-inspiring brilliance..”
by Joe Utichi [FilmFocus]
4 of 5

“..is easily the best of the prequels..”
by Christopher Null [Filmcritic]
3.5 of 5

“..by far the best of the most recent trilogy..”
by [The Movie Chicks]
3 of 4

“..an impressive finale..”
by Jonathan Rosenbaum [Chicago Reader]
9 of 10

“..a satisfying movie and one that should please most...”
by Takato Yamashita [Empire Movies]
4 of 4

“..A highly entertaining and rewarding film..”
by Mark Sells [The Oregon Herald]
7 of 10
Reviewed by Anton Bitel [Movie Gazette]
5 of 5
Reviewed by Bob Grimm [Sacramento News & Review]
5 of 5
Reviewed by William Arnold [Seattle Post-Intelligencer]
4.5 of 5
Reviewed by Rod Gustafson [Grading The Movies]
4 of 5
Reviewed by B. Alan Orange [MovieWeb]
4 of 5
Reviewed by Matthew Turner [ViewLondon]
4 of 5
Reviewed by Peter Sobczynski [EFilmCritic]
4 of 5
Reviewed by Robert Denerstein [Denver Rocky Mountain News]
4 of 5
Reviewed by Vicky Roach [Australian News Network]
3.5 of 5
Reviewed by Glenn Kenny [Premiere Magazine]
3.5 of 5
Reviewed by Jeffrey "The Vile One" Harris [Hybridmagazine]
3.5 of 5
Reviewed by Lew Irwin [ShowBIZ Data]
3.5 of 4
Reviewed by Kevin N. Laforest [Montreal Film Journal]
3.5 of 4
Reviewed by Ty Burr [Boston Globe]
3.5 of 5
Reviewed by Jeff Farance [The Daytona Beach News-Journal]
3.5 of 4
Reviewed by Michael Machosky [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review]
3.5 of 5
Reviewed by John Powell [Jam! Movies]
3.5 of 5
Reviewed by Owen Gleiberman [Entertainment Weekly]
3.5 of 5
Reviewed by Eric Lurio [Greenwich Village Gazette]
3 of 4
Reviewed by Daniel Fienberg [Zap2it]
3 of 4
Reviewed by Terry Lawson [Detroit Free Press]
3 of 5
Reviewed by Marc Savlov [Austin Chronicle]
3 of 4
Reviewed by Kit Bowen [Hollywood]
3 of 4
Reviewed by Peter Keough [The Boston Phoenix]
3 of 5
Reviewed by Hannah Guy [Chart Magazine]
2.5 of 4
Reviewed by Daniel Neman [Richmond Times-Dispatch]
2.5 of 4
Reviewed by Scott Mantz [Entertainment Insiders]
2.5 of 4
Reviewed by Duane Dudek [The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel]
2.5 of 4
Reviewed by Ed Gonzalez [Slant Magazine]
2.5 of 4
Reviewed by Bruce Westbrook [Houston Chronicle]
2.5 of 4
Reviewed by James O'Ehley [Sci-Fi Movie Page]
2 of 4
Reviewed by Peter Travers [Rolling Stone]
2 of 4
Reviewed by Tim Knight [Reel]
2 of 5
Reviewed by Andrea Chase [Killer Movie Reviews]
Reviewed by MaryAnn Johanson [The Flick Filosopher]
Reviewed by Jean Lowerison [San Diego Metropolitan]
Reviewed by David Parker [Box Office Prophets]
Reviewed by Anthony Lane [The New Yorker]
Reviewed by Purple [Movie Magazine International]
Reviewed by Stephanie Zacharek [Salon]
Reviewed by Kirk Honeycutt [The Hollywood Reporter]
Reviewed by Chris Gramlich [Exclaim!]

Reader's Reviews


Screen Name
Rate This Movie
Please Enter   
Comment
 
 
 
RSS
FB
Twitter

LATEST REVIEWS

HATCHET III :

“..The crowd that likes these things will certainly be psyched. Everyone else, not so much..”
by Joe Neumaier [New York Daily News]

STUCK IN LOVE :

“..it's a labour of familial love from first-time writer-director Josh Boone whose simple style well serves a story of sweetness and wit..”
by Tim Evans [Sky Movies]

VEHICLE 19 :

“..Vehicle 19 is best when it's silent..”
by Andrew Schenker [Village Voice]

SUMMER IN FEBRUARY :

“..ultimately, it's a competent, if uninspired, chronicle of an intriguing community hamstrung by that worthily reverential approach that afflicts British film-makers..”
by Tim Evans [Sky Movies]

MAN OF STEEL :

“..under Nolan's supervision he (Snyder) largely lays off the ADD editing and does a highly respectable, and sometimes inspired job of retooling the basic Superman mythology in "Man of Steel"..”
by Lou Lumenick [New York Post]

MONSTERS UNIVERSITY :

“..a fun, disposable watch..”
by Henry Barnes [The Guardian]

THE BLING RING :

“..this is an intriguingly intuitive and atmospheric movie..”
by Peter Bradshaw [The Guardian]

THIS IS THE END :

“.."This Is the End" suggests that they can at least sometimes be harmless, and as crude as the movie's humor often is, its spirit is sweet, sensitive and innocuous..”
by A.O. Scott [New York Times]

WORLD WAR Z :

“..a surprisingly smart, gripping and imaginative addition to the zombie-movie canon..”
by Scott Foundas [Variety]

EDEN :

“..the movie is frustratingly arbitrary in what it shows and what it leaves out. Although events are seen from Eden's perspective, we are never given a clear picture of her daily routine..”
by Stephen Holden [NY Times]