if ($layoutType == 'mobile')
mb_bottomframe($kanal, $htmlfile, $brstatus);
Must Love Dogs Reviews
- Home > Movie
> Must Love Dogs
> Must Love Dogs Reviews
- Genre : Comedy, Romance
- Release Date : July 29, 2005
- MPAA Rating : PG-13
- Duration : 90 minute(s)
- Production Budget : 30
- Studio : Warner Bros.
- Official Site : http://www.mustlovedogsmovie.com/
Reviews Rate :
Readers Rate : N/A
witty and friendly...good performances from a savvy cast,
by Andrea Chase [Killer Movie Reviews ]
this sort of stunning typicality is pretty damn depressing,
by Eugene Novikov [Film Blather ]
there's little to love in this basic (and basically bad) romantic comedy
by [E! Online ]
seldom strays from the rules governing mediocre romantic comedy
by Robert Denerstein [Denver Rocky Mountain News ]
plays smarter than the average summer movie.
by John Urbancich [Sun Newspapers of Cleveland ]
offers a handful of funny and touching moments and maintains a level of cuteness.
by William Arnold [Seattle Post-Intelligencer ]
by Sarah Chauncey [Reel ]
it?s hard to cheer
by Kimberley Jones [Austin Chronicle ]
it's missing the special chemistry necessary to make us fall head-over-heels for it.
by Sue Pierman [The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel ]
it's fun to watch, but not particularly memorable.
by Calvin Wilson [St. Louis Post-Dispatch ]
isn't the definitive take on modern middle-age dating it might have been.
by Ed Blank [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ]
isn't as seductive as its stars.
by Michael Wilmington [Chicago Tribune ]
is weakened by contrivances or conveniences ill-suited to character
by Deborah Hornblow [The Hartford Courant ]
is the perfect match.
by Matthew Reynolds [Hollywood ]
is part sitcom and part television dramedy.
by Wesley Morris [Boston Globe ]
is more like the perfect broken-family movie.
by Jan Stuart [Newsday ]
is going to be a summer sleeper hit.
by James Verniere [Boston Herald ]
is a slight, pandering romantic fantasy enlivened only by the work of its cast
by Glenn Whipp [L.A. Daily News ]
is a film that won't inspire love or hate.
by Randy Cordova [The Arizona Republic ]
generally sweet and romantic fun
by Edward Douglas [Comingsoon ]
an agreeable, entertaining, inoffensive trifle
by Mark Plante [The Cinema Source ]
a thoroughly conventional romantic comedy
by Michael Rechtshaffen [The Hollywood Reporter ]
a standard date movie designed to contend with this summer's machismo-heavy blockbusters.
by Bob Grimm [Sacramento News & Review ]
a romantic comedy that barely meets the standards for network renewal
by Frank Swietek [One Guy's Opinion ]
a movie of fake conflict, fake heart, even fake doggy love.
by Owen Gleiberman [Entertainment Weekly ]
a frisky romantic comedy with a great title and wonderfully appealing performances
by Peter Travers [Rolling Stone ]
Reviewed by Barbara Vancheri [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ]
Reviewed by James Berardinelli [ReelViews ]
Reviewed by Brooke Holgerso [The Boston Phoenix ]
Reviewed by Terry Lawson [Detroit Free Press ]
Reviewed by Ed Gonzalez [Slant Magazine ]
Reviewed by MaryAnn Johanson [The Flick Filosopher ]