WHAT'S HOT?
Home > Movie > L > The Lovely Bones > Reviews

The Lovely Bones Reviews

The Lovely Bones

Overview


Genre :

Drama

Release Date :

January 15, 2010 (Wide)

MPAA Rating :

PG-13

Director :

Peter Jackson

Starring :

Saoirse Ronan, Rachel Weisz, Mark Wahlberg, Stanley Tucci, Susan Sarandon, Michael Imperioli, Amanda Michalka, Rose McIver, Carolyn Dando

REVIEWS RATE:  Critics  Nothing's perfect, but it's worth seeing.    Readers  5 of 5 [Rate It]

“..We leave the cinema, not heart-broken. Just glad it's over..”
by Baz Bamigboye [Daily Mail]
4.5 of 5

“..threatens to outdo the popularity of its source material..”
by Sara Schieron [Boxoffice Magazine]
3 of 5

“..the performances of Ronan, Tucci, and some others make The Lovely Bones a film worth seein..”
by Chris Barsanti [Filmcritic.com]
“..rates as a significant artistic disappointment..”
by Todd McCarthy [Variety]
4 of 5

“..poignant, gripping, emotionally alive (but never sentimental) and gorgeous..”
by Ian Freer [Empire Magazine]
“..more hit-and-miss than unblemished triumph..”
by Kenneth Turan [LA Times]
“..a simpler, more button-pushing tale that misses the joy and heartbreak of the original..”
by Kirk Honeycutt [Hollywood Reporter]
Review rate : C+

“..a sad-but-hopeful, dramatic-but-gentle fairy tale..”
by Lisa Schwarzbaum [Entertainment Weekly]
“..a cinematic version of the old parlor game in which disparate graphic elements are assembled into a single strange picture..”
by A.O. Scott [NY Times]
2 of 5

“..a blushing mainstream entertainment..”
by Xan Brooks [The Guardian]
Review rate : C
Reviewed by Tasha Robinson [Onion AV Club]
3 of 4
Reviewed by Peter Travers [Rolling Stone]
2.5 of 4
Reviewed by Kyle Smith [New York Post]
2 of 5
Reviewed by Wendy Ide [Times Online]
2 of 4
Reviewed by Claudia Puig [USA Today]
1 of 5
Reviewed by Joe Neumaier [NY Daily News]

Reader's Reviews


Screen Name
Rate This Movie
Please Enter   
Comment
 
 
 
RSS
FB
Twitter

LATEST REVIEWS

45 YEARS :

“..it is supremely intelligent and moving and Rampling and Courtenay are superb..”
by Peter Bradshaw [The Guardian]

A WALK IN THE WOODS :

“..A Walk in the Woods is a jolly good time, sparking dozens of chuckles and a few strong laughs. Nothing special cinematically, it still provides a welcome showcase for wonderful star..”
by Todd McCarthy [Hollywood Reporter]

WAR ROOM :

“..are so heavy on broad pulpit pounding that it's challenging to get swept along by the story's message..”
by Tom Russo [Boston Globe]

ZIPPER :

“..on all counts, "Zipper" comes up short..”
by Katharine Pushkar [NY Daily News]

7 CHINESE BROTHERS :

“..feels like an homage to the early work of Wes Anderson with its plinky soundtrack, solipsistic banter and emphasis on uniforms..”
by Sara Stewart [New York Post]

TURBO KID :

“..it feels like amateur hour, but for fans of low-rent thrills it's kind of fun..”
by Soren Andersen [Seattle Times]

WHEN ANIMALS DREAM :

“..rich with tone but otherwise lacking bite..”
by Jordan Hoffman [NY Daily News]

POD :

“..a highly effective tale of terror that does a nice job of setting an unsettling tone from the onset and very rarely lets up until the film's conclusion..”
by Heather Wixson [Dailydead]

#LUCKY NUMBER :

“..obviously "#Lucky Number" will not appeal to everyone but for those that do find it entertaining, they will not be disappointed..”
by James McDonald [Irish Film Critic]

Z FOR ZACHARIAH :

“..the dramatic tension considerably less, in a movie that feels stranded somewhere between serious artistic ambition and the dystopian franchise-building of "The Hunger Games," "Divergent," et al..”
by Scott Foundas [Variety]