Home > Movie > H > The Honeymooners > Reviews

The Honeymooners Reviews

The Honeymooners


Genre :


Release Date :

June 10, 2005

MPAA Rating :


Director :

John Schultz

Starring :

Cedric the Entertainer, Mike Epps, Regina Hall, Gabrielle Union, Eric Stoltz, John Leguizamo, Jon Polito, Anne Pitoniak

REVIEWS RATE:  Critics  Not quite bad, but it's not recommended either.    Readers  Be the 1st!

2 of 4

“..this "Honeymooners" isn't the greatest..”
by Barry Paris [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette]
1.5 of 4

“..There is nothing offensive here, nor is there anything memorable..”
by Glenn Whipp [L.A. Daily News]
1.5 of 4

“..the movie suffers from a devastating flaw for a comedy: It isn't very funny..”
by Michael Wilmington [Chicago Tribune]
1 of 5

“..the most shameful and the least entertaining..”
by Peter Sobczynski [EFilmCritic]
“..Really bad..”
by Sarah Chauncey [Reel]
5 of 10

“..just a somewhat charming buddy comedy that's nothing to write about..”
by Joshua Starnes [Comingsoon]
1.5 of 5

“..hardly represents a comedy feast..”
by Robert Denerstein [TeenHollywood]
1.5 of 4

“..certainly isn't a tribute to the classic original...”
by Kit Bowen [Hollywood]
1 of 5

“..a dreary, dreadful bore...”
by Randy Cordova [The Arizona Republic]
2 of 4

“.."The Honeymooners" will please undemanding viewers..”
by Paul Doro [The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel]
1 of 4

“.."The Honeymooners" doesn't need to be compared with anything to show that it isn't funny. It does the job just fine on its own...”
by Betsy Pickle [Deseret News, Salt Lake City]
2.5 of 5
Reviewed by Jeff Farance [The Daytona Beach News-Journal]
2.5 of 4
Reviewed by Michael Machosky [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review]
2 of 4
Reviewed by Terry Lawson [Detroit Free Press]
2 of 5
Reviewed by [The Movie Chicks]
2 of 5
Reviewed by Kerry Bennett [Grading The Movies]
1.5 of 4
Reviewed by Jack Mathews [New York Daily News]
1.5 of 4
Reviewed by Daniel Neman [Richmond Times-Dispatch]
1.5 of 5
Reviewed by Frank Swietek [One Guy's Opinion]
1.5 of 4
Reviewed by Frank Ochieng [MovieEye]
1.5 of 5
Reviewed by Robert Denerstein [Denver Rocky Mountain News]
1.5 of 5
Reviewed by Pete Croatto [Filmcritic]
1.5 of 5
Reviewed by [E! Online]
1.5 of 5
Reviewed by Scott Brown [Entertainment Weekly]
1.5 of 4
Reviewed by Allison Benedikt [Chicago Tribune]
1 of 4
Reviewed by Mattias Frey [The Boston Phoenix]
1 of 4
Reviewed by Amy Biancolli [Houston Chronicle]
1 of 4
Reviewed by Daniel Fienberg [Zap2it]
1 of 5
Reviewed by Jim Slotek [Jam! Movies]
1 of 4
Reviewed by Nick Schager [Slant Magazine]
1 of 5
Reviewed by Eric D. Snider [The Land of Eric]
1 of 5
Reviewed by David Germain [The Hartford Courant]
1 of 5
Reviewed by Marrit Ingman [Austin Chronicle]
0.5 of 5
Reviewed by Lew Irwin [ShowBIZ Data]
Reviewed by William Arnold [Seattle Post-Intelligencer]
Reviewed by Scott Foundas [L.A. Weekly]
Reviewed by MaryAnn Johanson [The Flick Filosopher]
Reviewed by [U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops]
Reviewed by Kirk Honeycutt [The Hollywood Reporter]
Reviewed by [SPLICEDwire: Film Reviews, News & Interviews]
Reviewed by Betty Jo Tucker [ReelTalk]
Reviewed by Tony Medley [Tony Medley]
Reviewed by Sean Axmaker [Seattle Post-Intelligencer]

Reader's Reviews

Screen Name
Rate This Movie
Please Enter   


45 YEARS :

“..it is supremely intelligent and moving and Rampling and Courtenay are superb..”
by Peter Bradshaw [The Guardian]


“..A Walk in the Woods is a jolly good time, sparking dozens of chuckles and a few strong laughs. Nothing special cinematically, it still provides a welcome showcase for wonderful star..”
by Todd McCarthy [Hollywood Reporter]


“..are so heavy on broad pulpit pounding that it's challenging to get swept along by the story's message..”
by Tom Russo [Boston Globe]


“..on all counts, "Zipper" comes up short..”
by Katharine Pushkar [NY Daily News]


“..feels like an homage to the early work of Wes Anderson with its plinky soundtrack, solipsistic banter and emphasis on uniforms..”
by Sara Stewart [New York Post]


“..it feels like amateur hour, but for fans of low-rent thrills it's kind of fun..”
by Soren Andersen [Seattle Times]


“..rich with tone but otherwise lacking bite..”
by Jordan Hoffman [NY Daily News]


“..a highly effective tale of terror that does a nice job of setting an unsettling tone from the onset and very rarely lets up until the film's conclusion..”
by Heather Wixson [Dailydead]


“..obviously "#Lucky Number" will not appeal to everyone but for those that do find it entertaining, they will not be disappointed..”
by James McDonald [Irish Film Critic]


“..the dramatic tension considerably less, in a movie that feels stranded somewhere between serious artistic ambition and the dystopian franchise-building of "The Hunger Games," "Divergent," et al..”
by Scott Foundas [Variety]