WHAT'S HOT?

Fun with Dick and Jane Reviews

Fun with Dick and Jane

Overview


Genre :

Adventure, Comedy

Release Date :

December 21, 2005

MPAA Rating :

PG-13

Director :

Dean Parisot

Starring :

Jim Carey, Tea Leoni, Angie Harmon, Vincent Curatola, Jacob Davich, Alec Baldwin, Richard Jenkins, Stacey Travis

REVIEWS RATE:  Critics  Nothing's perfect, but it's worth seeing.    Readers  Be the 1st!

2 of 4

“..thin and flimsy..”
by Allison Benedikt [Chicago Tribune]
3 of 4

“..smarter, snarkier, sleeker version..”
by Sue Pierman [The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel]
5 of 5

“..really funny..”
by Andrew Casertano [The Cinema Source]
2.5 of 5

“..mind-numbing entertainment without a lick of story or character development..”
by David Levine [Filmcritic]
1 of 5

“..litters us with rubbish satire and dated humour..”
by David Mercier [FilmJudge]
2 of 4

“..is just another disposable end-of-the-year comedy thrown into multiplexes..”
by James Berardinelli [ReelViews]
4 of 5

“..a stridently amusing social satire..”
by Joe Williams [St. Louis Post-Dispatch]
2 of 4

“..a lopsided mess..”
by Gary Goldstein [Reel]
1.5 of 4

“..a flaccid, humorless update of the 1977 George Segal-Jane Fonda romp..”
by Nick Schager [Slant Magazine]
6 of 10
Reviewed by Joshua Starnes [Comingsoon]
4.5 of 5
Reviewed by Tom Maurstad [The Dallas Morning News]
4 of 5
Reviewed by Brian Orndorf [EFilmCritic]
3.5 of 4
Reviewed by Wesley Morris [Boston Globe]
3.5 of 5
Reviewed by Heather Wood [Sun Newspapers of Cleveland]
3 of 4
Reviewed by John Hayes [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette]
2.5 of 4
Reviewed by Brooke Holgerson [The Boston Phoenix]
2.5 of 5
Reviewed by Rafe Telsch [Cinema Blend]
2.5 of 4
Reviewed by James Verniere [Boston Herald]
2.5 of 5
Reviewed by Bill Muller [The Arizona Republic]
2 of 4
Reviewed by David Nusair [Reel Film Reviews]
2 of 4
Reviewed by Jami Bernard [New York Daily News]
2 of 5
Reviewed by Hanh Nguyen [Zap2it]
2 of 5
Reviewed by Rich Cline [Shadows on the Wall]
2 of 5
Reviewed by Marjorie Baumgarten [Austin Chronicle]
2 of 5
Reviewed by Mark Keizer [Boxoffice Magazine]
2 of 5
Reviewed by [E! Online]
2 of 4
Reviewed by Ed Blank [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review]
2 of 4
Reviewed by Gene Seymour [Newsday]
1.5 of 4
Reviewed by Jeff Vice [Deseret News, Salt Lake City]
1 of 5
Reviewed by Andrea Chase [Killer Movie Reviews]
Reviewed by Steve Schneider [Orlando Weekly]
Reviewed by Sheri Linden [The Hollywood Reporter]
Reviewed by Beth Mcarthur [Georgia Straight]
Reviewed by Vicky Roach [Australian News Network]

Reader's Reviews


Screen Name
Rate This Movie
Please Enter   
Comment
 
 
 
RSS
FB
Twitter

LATEST REVIEWS

45 YEARS :

“..it is supremely intelligent and moving and Rampling and Courtenay are superb..”
by Peter Bradshaw [The Guardian]

A WALK IN THE WOODS :

“..A Walk in the Woods is a jolly good time, sparking dozens of chuckles and a few strong laughs. Nothing special cinematically, it still provides a welcome showcase for wonderful star..”
by Todd McCarthy [Hollywood Reporter]

WAR ROOM :

“..are so heavy on broad pulpit pounding that it's challenging to get swept along by the story's message..”
by Tom Russo [Boston Globe]

ZIPPER :

“..on all counts, "Zipper" comes up short..”
by Katharine Pushkar [NY Daily News]

7 CHINESE BROTHERS :

“..feels like an homage to the early work of Wes Anderson with its plinky soundtrack, solipsistic banter and emphasis on uniforms..”
by Sara Stewart [New York Post]

TURBO KID :

“..it feels like amateur hour, but for fans of low-rent thrills it's kind of fun..”
by Soren Andersen [Seattle Times]

WHEN ANIMALS DREAM :

“..rich with tone but otherwise lacking bite..”
by Jordan Hoffman [NY Daily News]

POD :

“..a highly effective tale of terror that does a nice job of setting an unsettling tone from the onset and very rarely lets up until the film's conclusion..”
by Heather Wixson [Dailydead]

#LUCKY NUMBER :

“..obviously "#Lucky Number" will not appeal to everyone but for those that do find it entertaining, they will not be disappointed..”
by James McDonald [Irish Film Critic]

Z FOR ZACHARIAH :

“..the dramatic tension considerably less, in a movie that feels stranded somewhere between serious artistic ambition and the dystopian franchise-building of "The Hunger Games," "Divergent," et al..”
by Scott Foundas [Variety]