AceShowbiz - Boosie Badazz (Lil Boosie)'s alleged fiancee wants people to stop commenting on their relationship. During an Instagram Live, Rajel Nelson fired back at those who criticized their 12-year gap.

When speaking to her followers, the 28-year-old clarified, "I met him at 18 and I started talking to him when I was 21, and I been dating him since I was 24. This is the person who I've been with all my twenties." She added, "Let's talk about how many relationships you w***es have been in all y'all life. Y'all come on here messing with me for messing with somebody that's older than me, but who cares?"

Agreeing with users who suggested that age didn't matter, Rajel said, "There you have it." She went on to stress, "Nobody's perfect. Y'all keep talking about what he did. 'He did this, he did that.' Which man do y'all know is perfect? Please tell me."

"Y'all h*es get cheated on f**king day and ain't get nothing out the deal. Let's talk about it," she continued arguing. "Your dad was cheating on your mama, but your mama still stuck with your dad. Let's talk about it h*es. Y'all always try to make it seem like y'all life is perfect.

Not stopping there, Rajel fumed, "A lot of y'all grandparents and grandmothers - y'all don't want me to say or hurt y'all feelings - was f**king around with people older than them. So, just stop it." She then emphasized, "Y'all keep trying to talk about me dating somebody older than me, but y'all keep failing to realize, we didn't become boyfriend and girlfriend until I was 24. I didn't start talking to him, having conversations with him, until I was 21."

As for Boosie, he revealed plans to marry Rajel during his latest federal court appearance to discuss a motion to modify his no-contact order. According to Courthouse News, the 41-year-old's attorneys requested a modification to the terms of his release to allow him to resume contact with Rajel, whom he has not been allowed to make contact with since the beginning of his federal trial in June 2023.

"This is his fiancee who he lives with. This seems like a fairly serious curtailment of his personal rights," the judge reportedly explained per Meghann Cuniff's Legal Affairs and Trials. "And I'm not quite sure what the basis of it is other than the sort of vague assertion that she may have evidence."

The judge added that Rajel was not a witness to Boosie's case and was not present during his initial arrest in relation to his gun charges. Boosie's attorney Damon Alimouri additionally claimed, "It's vague, unless we have some details to fill the gaps."

However, the prosecution disagreed. "We vehemently oppose that," Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Wheat said. The U.S. attorney reportedly convened with the judge to explain that the prosecution has security concerns.