Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith Reviews

Movie Reviews

• Visually stunning and more moments of interest than the previous two prequels

  by Paul Boschen [Movie Marshal ]

• utterly mesmerizing, building magnificently to a coda setting up all the events in the original trilogy

  by Sara M. Fetters [MovieFreak ]

• The story effortlessly enthralls you within its mythology and dramatic-emotional roller coaster.

  by Julian Boyance [Movie-Vault ]

• the scariest, most exciting, most visually prodigious of the sextet

  by Michael Wilmington [Chicago Tribune ]

• the first must-see movie of the year.

  by David Edwards [London Daily Mirror ]

• the best of the most recent batch of three.

  by Annlee Ellingson [Boxoffice Magazine ]

• the best of George Lucas' prequels

  by Jeff Vice [Deseret News, Salt Lake City ]

• the best installment in the Star Wars series since 1980's The Empire Strikes Back.

  by James Berardinelli [ReelViews ]

• strings a complex plot onto a framework of practically non-stop action.

  by Paul Arendt [BBC Films ]

• Sith succeeds in providing a satisfying ending to the films

  by Chris Gore [Film Threat, Hollywood's Indie Voice ]

• probably the best of the three prequels.

  by Scott Chitwood [Comingsoon ]

• not only the best of the prequels but of the entire trilogy

  by David Nusair [Reel Film Reviews ]

• it delivers with such awe-inspiring brilliance

  by Joe Utichi [FilmFocus ]

• is easily the best of the prequels

  by Christopher Null [Filmcritic ]

• by far the best of the most recent trilogy

  by [The Movie Chicks ]

• an impressive finale

  by Jonathan Rosenbaum [Chicago Reader ]

• a satisfying movie and one that should please most.

  by Takato Yamashita [Empire Movies ]

• A highly entertaining and rewarding film

  by Mark Sells [The Oregon Herald ]
• Reviewed by Anton Bitel [Movie Gazette ]
• Reviewed by Bob Grimm [Sacramento News & Review ]
• Reviewed by William Arnold [Seattle Post-Intelligencer ]
• Reviewed by Rod Gustafson [Grading The Movies ]
• Reviewed by B. Alan Orange [MovieWeb ]
• Reviewed by Matthew Turner [ViewLondon ]
• Reviewed by Peter Sobczynski [EFilmCritic ]
• Reviewed by Robert Denerstein [Denver Rocky Mountain News ]
• Reviewed by Vicky Roach [Australian News Network ]
• Reviewed by Glenn Kenny [Premiere Magazine ]
• Reviewed by Jeffrey "The Vile One" Harris [Hybridmagazine ]
• Reviewed by Lew Irwin [ShowBIZ Data ]
• Reviewed by Kevin N. Laforest [Montreal Film Journal ]
• Reviewed by Ty Burr [Boston Globe ]
• Reviewed by Jeff Farance [The Daytona Beach News-Journal ]
• Reviewed by Michael Machosky [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ]
• Reviewed by John Powell [Jam! Movies ]
• Reviewed by Owen Gleiberman [Entertainment Weekly ]
• Reviewed by Eric Lurio [Greenwich Village Gazette ]
• Reviewed by Daniel Fienberg [Zap2it ]
• Reviewed by Terry Lawson [Detroit Free Press ]
• Reviewed by Marc Savlov [Austin Chronicle ]
• Reviewed by Kit Bowen [Hollywood ]
• Reviewed by Peter Keough [The Boston Phoenix ]
• Reviewed by Hannah Guy [Chart Magazine ]
• Reviewed by Daniel Neman [Richmond Times-Dispatch ]
• Reviewed by Scott Mantz [Entertainment Insiders ]
• Reviewed by Duane Dudek [The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel ]
• Reviewed by Ed Gonzalez [Slant Magazine ]
• Reviewed by Bruce Westbrook [Houston Chronicle ]
• Reviewed by James O'Ehley [Sci-Fi Movie Page ]
• Reviewed by Peter Travers [Rolling Stone ]
• Reviewed by Tim Knight [Reel ]
• Reviewed by Andrea Chase [Killer Movie Reviews ]
• Reviewed by MaryAnn Johanson [The Flick Filosopher ]
• Reviewed by Jean Lowerison [San Diego Metropolitan ]
• Reviewed by David Parker [Box Office Prophets ]
• Reviewed by Anthony Lane [The New Yorker ]
• Reviewed by Purple [Movie Magazine International ]
• Reviewed by Stephanie Zacharek [Salon ]
• Reviewed by Kirk Honeycutt [The Hollywood Reporter ]
• Reviewed by Chris Gramlich [Exclaim! ]

Reader's Reviews

How many stars? 1 [Very Bad] 2 3 4 5 [Excellent]

   

Comment *