Star Trek Into Darkness Reviews

Movie Reviews

• this is certainly an astute, exhilarating concoction

  by Andrew Pulver [The Guardian ]

• the movie is more concerned - as was the original - with the value of human life and the individual within society

  Review rate : B+ by Tom Long [Detroit News ]

• the film - which runs an epic 135mins - impressively freewheels between thrilling chases and laser battles on planets to beautifully shot spaceship attacks and onto a stunning climax back at Earth itself

  by Mark Adams [Screen International ]

• noisy, frenetic, grandiose and essentially a soap opera

  by ohn Anderson [Wall Street Journal ]

• J.J. Abrams sets his filmmaking to "stun" for "Star Trek Into Darkness," a sequel in every respect equal or even superior to its splendid 2009 predecessor

  by Scott Foundas [Variety ]

• it's more fun and more intense, without giving less to the characters

  by Peter Travers [Rolling Stone ]

• it's an exhilarating, emotionally rich and utterly pleasurable journey that wears its love for Trek fans old and new on its sleeve

  by Emma Dibdin [Digital Spy ]

• at its core an intergalactic manhunt tale about a traitor to the cause, the production gives the impression of a massive machine cranked up for two hours of full output; it efficiently delivers what it's built to do, but without style or personality

  by Todd McCarthy [Hollywood Reporter ]

• a blast, fun, funny, spectacular and exhilarating. The rule of great even-numbered Trek movies continues

  by Ian Freer [Empire Magazine ]

• "Star Trek Into Darkness" is still an involving film with more heart than most summer blockbusters

  by Matt Zoller Seitz [Chicago Sun-Times ]

• "Star Trek Into Darkness" is a giddy homage to what's come before it, but it also at least tries to go boldly where ... well, you know

  by Bill Goodykoontz [Arizona Republic ]

Reader's Reviews

How many stars? 1 [Very Bad] 2 3 4 5 [Excellent]

   

Comment *