The Amazing Spider-Man Reviews

  • The Amazing Spider-Man
    • Genre : Superhero, Action, Sci-Fi
    • Release Date :
    • MPAA Rating : PG-13
    • Duration : 136 minute(s)
    • Production Budget : -
    • Studio : Columbia Pictures
    • Official Site :
    • Reviews Rate
      Nothing's perfect, but it's worth seeing.

    • Readers Rate
      4 of 5

Movie Reviews

  • this Spidey reboot refreshes an old story through the on-trend notion of making a Marvel superhero less...super-heroic
    Review rate : A- by Lisa Schwarzbaum [Entertainment Weekly ]
  • this satisfying reboot slings a darker Spidey, a stronger romance and a welcome slew of tongue-in-cheek humor
    by Jordan Mintzer [Hollywood Reporter ]
  • sometimes dull and mostly uninspired, it's much less a satisfying reboot like "Batman Begins" than a pointless rehash in the mode of "Superman Returns"
    2 of 4 by Lou Lumenick [New York Post ]
  • it has less action, humor, imagination and vitality
    2.5 of 4 by Colin Covert [Minneapolis Star Tribune ]
  • is at least better than Raimi's Spider-Man 3, which was a mess
    2.5 of 4 by Peter Howell [Toronto Star ]
  • a Spider-Man that touches the heart. Now that really is amazing
    2.5 of 4 by Peter Travers [Rolling Stone ]
  • a smart-talking, web-slinging, thug-busting superhero
    2.5 of 4 by Steven Rea [Philadelphia Inquirer ]
  • a mostly slick, entertaining and emotionally involving recombination of fresh and familiar elements
    by Boyd van Hoeij [Variety ]
  • a grittier webslinger saga, led by a Peter Parker with swagger and angst and a tone defined more by emotional resonance than wide-eyed wonder. It still has plenty of fizz
    Review rate : B+ by Chris Vognar [Dallas Morning News ]
  • a disappointment on every level, from Garfield's sullen performance to the dull script that plods old roads. Decent special effects, though
    2 of 4 by Rafer Guzman [Newsday ]
  • a deflated end to a too-familiar story
    Review rate : C+ by Tom Long [Detroit News ]
  • 2.5 of 4 Reviewed by Ann Hornaday [Washington Post ]
  • Reviewed by Christopher Orr [The Atlantic ]

Reader's Reviews

  random image