- MOVIE
- 12:00 PM, Apr 27
the appropriate metaphorby Brian Marder [Hollywood ]
old-gal horrorby KimMorgan [Reel ]
not thrilling enoughby Jeff Vice [Deseret News, Salt Lake City ]
not as a good horror filmby Paul Doro [The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel ]
not a successful thrillerby Jessica Cerretani [The Boston Phoenix ]
nasty little movieby Wesley Morris [Boston Globe ]
more of a mystery than a horror movieby James Berardinelli [ReelViews ]
more moody than scaryby Bruce Westbrook [Houston Chronicle ]
more creaky than creepyby Bill Muller [The Arizona Republic ]
lacks tension and suspenseby Marjorie Baumgarten [Austin Chronicle ]
just not goodby Bruce Bluett [The Cinema Source ]
just a shaggyby James Verniere [Boston Herald ]
isn't horribleby Vince Leo [Qwipster's Movie Reviews ]
is half-way watchable.by Nev Pierce [BBC Films ]
is all mood and build and subtle clues, and it works brilliantlyby Scott Andrews [FilmFocus ]
far better than the usual Hollywood horror fareby Jason Cook [The Spinning Image ]
effectively creepy, atmospheric thrillerby Matthew Turner [ViewLondon ]
deeply lacklustre bag of bones, boasting plenty of the standard horror/suspense clichesby Scottie [Iofilm ]
boredomby [E! Online ]
an enjoyably unsettling exercise in hoodoo hysteriaby Calvin Wilson [St. Louis Post-Dispatch ]
an elegantly mounted ghost storyby Michael Rechtshaffen [The Hollywood Reporter ]
all very boring and ridiculousby Ed Gonzalez [Slant Magazine ]
a preposterously enjoyable suspense flickby Rich Cline [Shadows on the Wall ]
a little more interestingby Scott Chitwood [Comingsoon ]
a fine little shotby Scott Brown [Entertainment Weekly ]
a bad horror clicheby Michael Machosky [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ]