Kites Reviews



  • Kites
    • Genre : Romance, Comedy, Drama
    • Release Date :
    • MPAA Rating : -
    • Duration : 130 minute(s)
    • Production Budget : -
    • Studio : Reliance BIG Pictures
    • Official Site : http://www.kites-thefilm.com/
    • Reviews Rate
      Nothing's perfect, but it's worth seeing.

    • Readers Rate
      2 of 5

Movie Reviews

  • You have been warned
    by David Chute [Village Voice ]
  • The result is a lovers-on-the-lam blast of pure pulp escapism, so devoted to diversion that you probably won't even notice the corn
    by Jeannette Catsoulis [NY Times ]
  • the overblown action is all part of a piece in a giddy, hyperbolic style that has made Bollywood more popular than Hollywood to much of the world
    3 of 4 by Ted Fry [Seattle Times ]
  • The film is rousing, but it does not soar
    2.5 of 5 by Marjorie Baumgarten [Austin Chronicle ]
  • The deliriously entertaining and shamelessly derivative Hindi "Kites" owes more to Hollywood than Bollywood
    by Peter DeBruge [Variety ]
  • The constantly shifting tone can be off-putting at first but, by the third act, you find the characters and story growing on you and the romance, despite the histrionics, moving
    by Annlee Ellingson [Moving Pictures Magazine ]
  • Kites does carry one distinguishing feature of Bollywood film: the primacy of fate
    by Frank Lovece [Film Journal International ]
  • It tells a simple story - an almost archetypal story - but it does so with a lot of passion and technical sophistication
    by Mick LaSalle [San Francisco Chronicle ]
  • Indian star Hrithik Roshan makes a striking international debut in an ambitious Bollywood crossover film
    by Lisa Tsering [Hollywood Reporter ]
  • If you don't like the genre, wait three minutes
    2 of 4 by Carrie Rickey [Philadelphia Inquirer ]
  • an intense, exciting and highly entertaining film
    3 of 4 by Bruce DeMara [Toronto Star ]
  • "Kites" is so heady and naive a brew, it would have been perfect for the silent screen
    3.5 of 5 by Kevin Thomas [LA Times ]

Reader's Reviews

  random image