Ghostbusters: Afterlife Reviews

  • Ghostbusters: Afterlife
    • Genre : Fantasy,Comedy
    • Release Date :
    • MPAA Rating : PG-13
    • Duration : -
    • Production Budget : -
    • Studio : Sony Pictures
    • Official Site :
    • Reviews Rate
      Not quite bad, but it's not recommended either.

    • Readers Rate
      3 of 5

Movie Reviews

  • though flattering through and through, the film is ironically removed from the charms of the worshipped original
    1 of 4 by Jake Cole [Slant Magazine ]
  • the film are fresh, creative, and often hilarious, with solid writing and delightful Easter eggs for all the lifelong "Ghostbusters"
    by Josh Flanders [Chicago Reader ]
  • at a certain point "Afterlife" becomes a wholesale remake of the original; It's nostalgic, it's easy, but it's empty, and it doesn't bring anything fresh to the table
    Review rate : D by Adam Graham [Detroit News ]
  • a sequel-slash-restart, "Ghostbusters: Afterlife" shoots for its own version of goofy buddy comedy and funhouse scariness; While full of love for the originals, Jason Reitman’s film firmly establishes its own new generation
    4 of 5 by Olly Richards [Empire Magazine ]
  • a playful paranormal reboot offers funny frights for families; The Ghostbusters franchise crosses streams to find new life as a family film that's frighteningly good fun
    2 of 5 by Tara McNamara [Common Sense Media ]
  • a charmless sequel that lacks all of the fun; "Ghostbusters: Afterlife" is inoffensive family-friendly entertainment, but it doesn't have any soul, charm, or good drama to justify its existence
    2 of 5 by Mae Abdulbaki [ScreenRant ]
  • "Ghostbusters: Afterlife" may not change cinema in the way the original did, but it's a worthy next generation
    3.5 of 5 by Richard Whittaker [Austin Chronicle ]
  • "Ghostbusters: Afterlife" is missing one major, precious, scientific, cinematic element: A truly involving and cohesive new story; the franchise delivers action and nostalgia but falls short on plot and comedy
    2 of 4 by Richard Roeper [Chicago Sun-Times ]

Reader's Reviews

  random image