- TV
- 10:29 AM, Apr 26
ultimately a middling effort that lacks dramatic pay-off.by Tim Knight [Reel ]
never really lives up to its full potential.by Scott Chitwood [Comingsoon ]
great funby William Arnold [Seattle Post-Intelligencer ]
gets sillier and less tense the closer it gets to its major revelationsby Michael Phillips [Chicago Tribune ]
fulfills enough of its tension-producing objectivesby Robert Denerstein [Denver Rocky Mountain News ]
definitely worth seeingby Zak Santucci [The Cinema Source ]
crap out on its promisesby Steve Schneider [Orlando Weekly ]
can't avoid falling apart during its final half-hour.by James Berardinelli [ReelViews ]
an excellent takeoffby Kit Bowen [Hollywood ]
an absorbing mystery thriller that will hold any audience to the finish.by Ed Blank [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ]
a terrific-looking thriller that wastes no time with embellishment or asides.by Sheri Linden [Boxoffice Magazine ]
a taut and clever thrillerby [E! Online ]
a solid enough takeoff, but with such unnecessary distractions, even Foster can't save it from crashing.by Paul Doro [The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel ]
a high-concept idea that was never fleshed out into anything resembling a cohesive and satisfying story,by Scott Weinberg [EFilmCritic ]
a first-rate thriller and one of the don't-miss films of the fall seasonby Calvin Wilson [St. Louis Post-Dispatch ]
a film that leaves no doubt how it is going to end and, upon examination, makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.by James Verniere [Boston Herald ]