Doom Reviews



  • Doom
    • Genre : Action, Sci-Fi, Adventure
    • Release Date :
    • MPAA Rating : R
    • Duration : 100 minute(s)
    • Production Budget : 70
    • Studio : Universal Pictures
    • Official Site : http://www.doommovie.com/
    • Reviews Rate
      Not quite bad, but it's not recommended either.

    • Readers Rate
      5 of 5

Movie Reviews

  • won't disappoint its hardcore fans
    3 of 5 by J.P. Mangalindan [The Cinema Source ]
  • ultimately embraces the cliched doom of all video game movies.
    2 of 4 by Robert K. Elder [Chicago Tribune ]
  • the most cleverly engineered video-game movie made to date.
    3.5 of 5 by Sean Axmaker [Seattle Post-Intelligencer ]
  • poorly photographed and edited rehash of the plots of "Alien" and "The Thing."
    2 of 4 by Ed Blank [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ]
  • nothing more than a thoroughly mediocre Aliens ripoff
    1.5 of 4 by David Nusair [Reel Film Reviews ]
  • muddled, derivative crap
    by Chuck Wilson [L.A. Weekly ]
  • manages to escape the game-to-movie curse
    3.5 of 5 by Marc Bernardin [Entertainment Weekly ]
  • is ear-splitting, unevenly acted and profoundly uninspired
    1.5 of 4 by James Verniere [Boston Herald ]
  • is dreary-looking and painfully slow
    2 of 4 by Wesley Morris [Boston Globe ]
  • does a good job of replicating the claustrophobic look and feel of the game
    by Richard James Havis [The Hollywood Reporter ]
  • comes as no great shocker
    2 of 5 by Robert Denerstein [Denver Rocky Mountain News ]
  • brings nothing new to the table.
    2 of 4 by Paul Doro [The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel ]
  • a surprisingly non-kitschy action film
    4 of 5 by Victor Godinez [The Dallas Morning News ]
  • a faithful movie adaptation of a mega-popular game
    2 of 4 by John Monaghan [Detroit Free Press ]
  • a decent enough action film
    6 of 10 by Joshua Starnes [Comingsoon ]
  • a D-grade mess that's more a rip-off of Alien than an attempt to tell a compelling story
    1 of 4 by James Berardinelli [ReelViews ]
  • 2.5 of 5 Reviewed by Vince Leo [Qwipster's Movie Reviews ]
  • 2.5 of 5 Reviewed by [E! Online ]
  • 2.5 of 5 Reviewed by Calvin Wilson [St. Louis Post-Dispatch ]
  • 2 of 4 Reviewed by Nick Schager [Slant Magazine ]
  • 2 of 5 Reviewed by Pete Vonder Haar [Film Threat, Hollywood's Indie Voice ]
  • 2 of 4 Reviewed by Sara M. Fetters [MovieFreak ]
  • 1.5 of 5 Reviewed by Marc Savlov [Austin Chronicle ]
  • 1.5 of 4 Reviewed by Gene Seymour [Newsday ]
  • 1.5 of 4 Reviewed by Jeff Vice [Deseret News, Salt Lake City ]
  • 1 of 5 Reviewed by Brian Orndorf [EFilmCritic ]
  • 1 of 4 Reviewed by Daniel Fienberg [Zap2it ]
  • 1 of 4 Reviewed by Roger Moore [Houston Chronicle ]
  • 1 of 5 Reviewed by Annette Cardwell [Filmcritic ]
  • 1 of 4 Reviewed by Elizabeth Weitzman [New York Daily News ]

Reader's Reviews

  random image