A Cure for Wellness Reviews



  • A Cure for Wellness
    • Genre : Horror, Supernatural
    • Release Date :
    • MPAA Rating : R
    • Duration : 146 minute(s)
    • Production Budget : -
    • Studio : 20th Century Fox
    • Official Site : http://www.acureforwellness.com/
    • Reviews Rate
      Nothing's perfect, but it's worth seeing.

    • Readers Rate
      N/A

Movie Reviews

  • visually gorgeous, admirable, and unsatisfying
    3 of 5 by Alex Welch [IGN Movies ]
  • this unconscionably elaborate attempt at an old-fashioned Gothic thriller looks great but is beyond silly
    by Todd McCarthy [Hollywood Reporter ]
  • this film really needs is intimations of immortality and incest, you may find yourself wondering: What was the point of all this spookiness-by-numbers?
    2 of 4 by David Fear [Rolling Stone ]
  • the first half of the film nicely creates a squirmy, elegant tension. But then ... the whole thing drags on so long you start forgetting why Lockhart ever showed up at this place
    2 of 4 by Moira MacDonald [Seattle Times ]
  • starts out flush with promise but ends up circling the bowl
    2 of 5 by Joe Dziemianowicz [NY Daily News ]
  • narratively preposterous and probably an hour too long, it's the year's first big howler. It could have been DeHaan's Shutter Island, but instead it's just Gore Verbinski's latest self-indulgent mess following The Lone Ranger
    Review rate : C- by Chris Nashawaty [Entertainment Weekly ]
  • it's too messy, maniacally veering from elegant restraint to unhinged hokum and the absurd running time doesn't befit what's ultimately a rather hollow campside tale. There's hope for the ailing horror genre yet, but this is far from the cure
    2 of 5 by Benjamin Lee [The Guardian ]
  • it never really comes together, and while the film is enjoyable when take piecemeal, overall Verbinski's reach once again exceeds his grasp
    Review rate : C+ by Matt Goldberg [Collider ]
  • Gore Verbinski has created a ravishing spectacle at this "Magic Mountain"
    3 of 4 by Kyle Smith [New York Post ]

Reader's Reviews

  random image