Cats Reviews

  • Cats
    • Genre : Drama, Musical
    • Release Date :
    • MPAA Rating : -
    • Duration : -
    • Production Budget : -
    • Studio : Universal Pictures
    • Official Site :
    • Reviews Rate
      Not quite bad, but it's not recommended either.

    • Readers Rate

Movie Reviews

  • Tom Hooper's movie is a huge failure because he's completely abandoned the fundamentals of what made "Cats" a terrific show
    by Johnny Oleksinski [New York Post ]
  • the baffling film adaptation of Andrew Lloyd Webber's popular stage musical, an astonishing misfire on every other conceivable level. Forget worst movie of the year: "Cats" is the biggest disaster of the decade, and possibly thus far in the millennium
    Review rate : D- by Adam Graham [Detroit News ]
  • it just didn't work for me, and even worse, it bored me half to death
    2 of 5 by Linda Marric [HeyUGuys ]
  • it all just feels so wrong; No more than the original show, the film has no plot, other than the cats competing in characterfulness to win this inexplicable talent contest
    2 of 5 by David Sexton [London Evening Standard ]
  • I found it all exhausting; While the desired effect seems to be one of enchanting artifice, like the original "Mary Poppins", the visuals have a harsh quality that points up the heavy reliance on CGI components throughout
    by David Rooney [The Hollywood Reporter ]
  • for the most part, "Cats" is both a horror and an endurance test, a dispatch from some neon-drenched netherworld where the ghastly is inextricable from the tedious
    by Justin Chang [Los Angeles Times ]
  • extravagant but unsettling's a muddle; Fans of the stage musical may swoon, but others will be severely allergic
    1.5 of 4 by Rafer Guzman [Newsday ]
  • destined to be an instant guilty pleasure, "Cats" is an insane musical experiment gone wrong. It is truly like nothing cinema has ever seen. The question is, is it something cinema actually wanted?
    2 of 5 by John Nugent [Empire Magazine ]
  • a marvelously bonkers movie adaptation; "Cats" brings Webber's Broadway sensation to life as an audaciously bizarre spectacle sure to delight and divide as much as the original musical does
    3 of 5 by Sandy Schaefer [ScreenRant ]
  • a bunch of well-known celebrities get turned into singing, scenery-chewing digital kitties in the utterly absurd yet oddly charming movie musical version of the Broadway hit
    2.5 of 4 by Brian Truitt [USA Today ]
  • "Cats" may flop but it will be found by a like-minded audience, maybe the same one that rescued "The Greatest Showman". Don't be the sourpuss to tell these people they're wrong
    3 of 5 by Joshua Rothkopf [Time Out New York ]
  • "Cats" is the musical, the movie, the disaster.. my eyes are burning. Oh God, my eyes
    1 of 5 by Ty Burr [Boston Globe ]
  • "Cats" is a special kind of terrible, though; It's gripping in the most delightfully horrible way and easily one of the worst movies of the decade, by leaps and bounds. It's such a unique and confident brand of awful..
    1 of 5 by Charlie Ridgely [ComicBook Movie ]

Reader's Reviews

  random image