WHAT'S HOT?

'Skins' Drops 51 Percent in Ratings as Advertisers Continue to Ditch It

January 26, 2011 06:37:56 GMT

It could be the bad press that the controversial show has been receiving since its premiere but it may as well be the case of a weak follow-up from 'Jersey Shore'.


'Skins' Drops 51 Percent in Ratings as Advertisers Continue to Ditch It
See larger image

MTV may take a stand against the criticism that "Skins" is too dangerous for the teens in America but it can't ignore the fact that the number of people watching plunges sharply from the premiere to the second episode. According to Nielsen's data, 3.3 million tuned in last week, but the number is cut by 51% by the second week to only 1.6 million viewers.

However, it should be taken note that the sophomore episode got a weaker lead-in from "Jersey Shore". The Monday, January 24 episode followed a re-rerun of the reality show which only drew 1.2 million viewers. Last week, "Skins" benefited from an all-new episode of "Jersey Shore" which drew 8.87 million viewers. A spokeswoman for MTV said the lead-in show could continue to shift in coming weeks.

The declining ratings, accumulated with the fact that advertisers are pulling their involvements, will give the network quite a headache. As many as eight companies such as Subways, Foot Locker Inc. and L'Oreal SA have backed out after the show is getting criticism from Parents TV Council. Red Bull, Zeno Corp. and EA games stuck to the show in the second episode but PTC is planning to persuade them to quit.

"Skins" which is a U.S. adaptation of a British series of the same name is slammed by the TV watchdog as the "most dangerous" show for teens. MTV had insisted that despite the portrayal by teens experimenting with sex and drugs, the show is aiming for adults audience and will not air before 10/9c. In a blog post Monday, co-creator Bryan Elsley defended the show, calling it "a very serious attempt to get to the roots of young people's lives....it tries to tell the truth. Sometimes that truth can be a little painful to adults and parents."

MTV declined to comment about being ditched by companies but said in a previous statement that they are confident "Skins" will "continue to connect with the audience it was created for and that advertisers will take advantage of the opportunity to reach them."

© AceShowbiz.com




Post Your Comments

posted by Me bitches on Jan 26, 2011
Id have thought with all the controvesy around it branding it child porn more people would watch it? this is America.
posted by Jade on Jan 26, 2011
If they are going to get up in arms about anything, it should be about the continuous mediocre American remakes of good British tv shows. Is there no creativity anymore? I enjoy the original Skins, and I've watched both episodes of the American version so far. It just isn't good. And while I think all of the controversy over the show is a bit ridiculous (it is already toned down from the British version) I kind of want this show to fail.
posted by cmk on Jan 26, 2011
the show just isn't that great
posted by Aqua on Jan 26, 2011
What I don't understand is why they switch the gay boy out. If they want realistic portrayal, then they should keep it like the original instead of just catering to straight males. Well, they can call themselves progressive all the want, but others know better.

Screen Name
Please Enter   
Comment
 
 
 
RSS
FB
Twitter