The Devil's Rejects Reviews



  • The Devil's Rejects
    • Genre : Horror
    • Release Date :
    • MPAA Rating : R
    • Duration : 101 minute(s)
    • Production Budget : 7
    • Studio : Lions Gate Films
    • Official Site : http://www.thedevilsrejects.com/
    • Reviews Rate
      Nothing's perfect, but it's worth seeing.

    • Readers Rate
      2 of 5

Movie Reviews

  • Zombie's new movie, The Devil's Rejects, unwisely pretends to seriousness his screenwriting can't sustain
    by Ian Grey [Baltimore City Paper ]
  • Zombie has made a film not so much out of reverence for the images that shaped his youth
    2 of 4 by Ed Gonzalez [Slant Magazine ]
  • works extraordinarily well
    5 of 5 by Brian Orndorf [EFilmCritic ]
  • suffers from distinctly uneven pacing and occasional bursts of comedy that just come off as silly and unnecessary.
    2 of 4 by David Nusair [Reel Film Reviews ]
  • proves a much superior film
    7 of 10 by Daniel Auty [The Spinning Image ]
  • only bits and pieces of it were enjoyable
    by Lawrence P. Raffel [Monsters At Play ]
  • nothing but a mirage of bad story mixed with extreme unthinkable violence and gore.
    2.5 of 5 by Andrew Casertano [The Cinema Source ]
  • isn't enough to make the film watchable to anyone beyond grindhouse devotees.
    1.5 of 5 by Rich Cline [Shadows on the Wall ]
  • is superbly well-made.
    2 of 4 by Jack Mathews [New York Daily News ]
  • is just gory eye-candy.
    2 of 4 by Guylaine Cadorette [Hollywood ]
  • is easily one of the finest examples of brutal, uncompromising terror filmmaking
    4.5 of 5 by Jeremiah Kipp [Flipside Movie Emporium ]
  • gets the cult midnight movie vibe down cold
    by Michael Rechtshaffen [The Hollywood Reporter ]
  • an insipid, head-scratchingly disgusting mess ranking right up there with some of the most disgusting things
    by Sara M. Fetters [MovieFreak ]
  • a vile and reprehensible motion picture.
    0.5 of 4 by James Berardinelli [ReelViews ]
  • a surprisingly well-made, well acted and funny film
    7 of 10 by [Future Movies ]
  • a masterpiece.
    4 of 5 by Carlo Cavagna [AboutFilm ]
  • a hodge podge of poorly conceptualized vignettes
    2 of 10 by Edward Douglas [Comingsoon ]
  • A gritty Western-via-grindhouse modern exploitation flick imbued with the ferocity of independent '70s horror,
    4 of 5 by Nicholas Schager [Filmcritic ]
  • 4.5 of 5 Reviewed by [E! Online ]
  • 3.5 of 5 Reviewed by Marc Savlov [Austin Chronicle ]
  • 3.5 of 4 Reviewed by Tim Cogshell [Boxoffice Magazine ]
  • 3.5 of 5 Reviewed by Owen Gleiberman [Entertainment Weekly ]
  • 3 of 4 Reviewed by Joe Williams [St. Louis Post-Dispatch ]
  • 2.5 of 4 Reviewed by Tom Meek [The Boston Phoenix ]
  • 2.5 of 4 Reviewed by Ty Burr [Boston Globe ]
  • 2.5 of 4 Reviewed by Daniel Fienberg [Zap2it ]
  • 2.5 of 5 Reviewed by Eugene Novikov [Film Blather ]
  • 2.5 of 4 Reviewed by Gene Seymour [Newsday ]
  • 2.5 of 4 Reviewed by Bob Strauss [L.A. Daily News ]
  • 2 of 4 Reviewed by Warren Curry [Entertainment Insiders ]
  • 2 of 4 Reviewed by Terry Lawson [Detroit Free Press ]
  • 1.5 of 5 Reviewed by Bill Muller [The Arizona Republic ]
  • 1.5 of 4 Reviewed by Chelsea Bain [Boston Herald ]
  • 1 of 5 Reviewed by Christy Lemire [The Dallas Morning News ]
  • 1 of 4 Reviewed by Barbara Vancheri [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ]
  • 1 of 4 Reviewed by Paul Doro [The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel ]
  • 1 of 5 Reviewed by Christy Lemire [Denver Rocky Mountain News ]
  • 1 of 4 Reviewed by Ed Blank [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ]
  • Reviewed by Chris Hewitt [Houston Chronicle ]
  • Reviewed by Robert K. Elder [Chicago Tribune ]

Reader's Reviews

  random image