WHAT'S HOT?
Home > Movie > C > Chloe > Reviews

Chloe Reviews

Chloe

Overview


Genre :

Drama, Thriller

Release Date :

March 26, 2010 (Limited)

MPAA Rating :

R

Director :

Atom Egoyan

Starring :

Amanda Seyfried, Julianne Moore, Liam Neeson, Nina Dobrev, Max Thieriot, R.H. Thomson, Meghan Heffern

REVIEWS RATE:  Critics  Nothing's perfect, but it's worth seeing.    Readers  5 of 5 [Rate It]

“..When it's over, you're left feeling kind of cheap..”
by A.O. Scott [NY Times]
3 of 4

“..watching "Chloe" feels like entering strange and dangerous ground..”
by Tom Keogh [Seattle Times]
3.5 of 5

“..too pat, alas..”
by Christopher Null [Filmcritic.com]
2 of 4

“..there's enough erotic steam generated to make you suspend disbelief..”
by Peter Travers [Rolling Stone]
Review rate : B-

“..stylish, naughty, slightly silly movie..”
by Gary Thompson [Philadelphia Daily News]
2.5 of 4

“..sometimes we go to movies not for the story but for the erotic promise..”
by Carrie Rickey [Philadelphia Inquirer]
1.5 of 4

“..silly erotic thriller..”
by Janice Page [Boston Globe]
Review rate : C

“..most of Chloe is plodding and drab..”
by Owen Gleiberman [Entertainment Weekly]
3 of 4

“..it's full of surprises..”
by Calvin Wilson [St. Louis Post-Dispatch]
2.5 of 4

“..It's actually enjoyable level given reasonable expectations..”
by James Berardinelli [ReelViews]
2 of 4

“..It doesn't feel completely icy or clinical..”
by Jeff Vice [Deseret News]
3.5 of 4

“..Hell hath no fury like "Chloe"..”
by Graham Killeen [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel]
2 of 5

“..a steamy erotic noir with the same preposterous premise..”
by Peter Bradshaw [The Guardian]
“..a rueful examination of middle-aged insecurity and longing..”
by Mick LaSalle [San Francisco Chronicle]
3 of 4

“.."Chloe" is seven-eighths of a strong thriller..”
by Colin Covert [Minneapolis Star Tribune]

Reader's Reviews


Screen Name
Rate This Movie
Please Enter   
Comment
 
 
 
RSS
FB
Twitter

LATEST REVIEWS

45 YEARS :

“..it is supremely intelligent and moving and Rampling and Courtenay are superb..”
by Peter Bradshaw [The Guardian]

A WALK IN THE WOODS :

“..A Walk in the Woods is a jolly good time, sparking dozens of chuckles and a few strong laughs. Nothing special cinematically, it still provides a welcome showcase for wonderful star..”
by Todd McCarthy [Hollywood Reporter]

WAR ROOM :

“..are so heavy on broad pulpit pounding that it's challenging to get swept along by the story's message..”
by Tom Russo [Boston Globe]

ZIPPER :

“..on all counts, "Zipper" comes up short..”
by Katharine Pushkar [NY Daily News]

7 CHINESE BROTHERS :

“..feels like an homage to the early work of Wes Anderson with its plinky soundtrack, solipsistic banter and emphasis on uniforms..”
by Sara Stewart [New York Post]

TURBO KID :

“..it feels like amateur hour, but for fans of low-rent thrills it's kind of fun..”
by Soren Andersen [Seattle Times]

WHEN ANIMALS DREAM :

“..rich with tone but otherwise lacking bite..”
by Jordan Hoffman [NY Daily News]

POD :

“..a highly effective tale of terror that does a nice job of setting an unsettling tone from the onset and very rarely lets up until the film's conclusion..”
by Heather Wixson [Dailydead]

#LUCKY NUMBER :

“..obviously "#Lucky Number" will not appeal to everyone but for those that do find it entertaining, they will not be disappointed..”
by James McDonald [Irish Film Critic]

Z FOR ZACHARIAH :

“..the dramatic tension considerably less, in a movie that feels stranded somewhere between serious artistic ambition and the dystopian franchise-building of "The Hunger Games," "Divergent," et al..”
by Scott Foundas [Variety]