WHAT'S HOT?
Home > Movie > C > Chloe > Reviews

Chloe Reviews

Chloe

Overview


Genre :

Drama, Thriller

Release Date :

March 26, 2010 (Limited)

MPAA Rating :

R

Director :

Atom Egoyan

Starring :

Amanda Seyfried, Julianne Moore, Liam Neeson, Nina Dobrev, Max Thieriot, R.H. Thomson, Meghan Heffern

REVIEWS RATE:  Critics  Nothing's perfect, but it's worth seeing.    Readers  5 of 5 [Rate It]

“..When it's over, you're left feeling kind of cheap..”
by A.O. Scott [NY Times]
3 of 4

“..watching "Chloe" feels like entering strange and dangerous ground..”
by Tom Keogh [Seattle Times]
3.5 of 5

“..too pat, alas..”
by Christopher Null [Filmcritic.com]
2 of 4

“..there's enough erotic steam generated to make you suspend disbelief..”
by Peter Travers [Rolling Stone]
Review rate : B-

“..stylish, naughty, slightly silly movie..”
by Gary Thompson [Philadelphia Daily News]
2.5 of 4

“..sometimes we go to movies not for the story but for the erotic promise..”
by Carrie Rickey [Philadelphia Inquirer]
1.5 of 4

“..silly erotic thriller..”
by Janice Page [Boston Globe]
Review rate : C

“..most of Chloe is plodding and drab..”
by Owen Gleiberman [Entertainment Weekly]
3 of 4

“..it's full of surprises..”
by Calvin Wilson [St. Louis Post-Dispatch]
2.5 of 4

“..It's actually enjoyable level given reasonable expectations..”
by James Berardinelli [ReelViews]
2 of 4

“..It doesn't feel completely icy or clinical..”
by Jeff Vice [Deseret News]
3.5 of 4

“..Hell hath no fury like "Chloe"..”
by Graham Killeen [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel]
2 of 5

“..a steamy erotic noir with the same preposterous premise..”
by Peter Bradshaw [The Guardian]
“..a rueful examination of middle-aged insecurity and longing..”
by Mick LaSalle [San Francisco Chronicle]
3 of 4

“.."Chloe" is seven-eighths of a strong thriller..”
by Colin Covert [Minneapolis Star Tribune]

Reader's Reviews


Screen Name
Rate This Movie
Please Enter   
Comment
 
 
 
RSS
FB
Twitter

LATEST REVIEWS

HEMINGWAY & GELLHORN :

“..such moments feel like empty gestures when stacked up against a barrage of biopic cliches..”
by A.A. Dowd [Time Out Chicago]

COWGIRLS N' ANGELS :

“..the characters were picked perfectly, and were just so relatable..”
by OrangeHeroMama [Home of OHM]

THE INTOUCHABLES :

“..it's hard to muster much enthusiasm for a movie that leans so heavily on regressive culture-clash shtick and unimaginative stereotypes..”
by Jon Frosch [The Atlantic]

CHERNOBYL DIARIES :

“..the acting is what you’d expect-on the level of what you’ll find in any crummy horror movie shown on the SyFy network..”
by Frank Swietek [One Guy's Opinion]

MEN IN BLACK 3 :

“..sparing a few jokes and nifty set pieces..”
by John Semley [Slant Magazine]

MIGHTY FINE :

“..the mood is generally melodramatic and ends as mushy..”
by Nick Schager [Village Voice]

MOONRISE KINGDOM :

“..this meticulous and convincing detail does not add up to realism but - depending on your perspective - to something either much less or much more than that..”
by Andrew O'Hehir [Salon.com]

BATTLESHIP :

“..too much uninteresting dialogue about “mysterious” aliens to wade through – plus, oodles of nauseating jingoism and slow-motion heroism..”
by Adam Litovitz [Globe and Mail]

HYSTERIA :

“..for all of its sexual posturing and potential to be truly saucy and unconventional, Tanya Wexler's "Hysteria" is inoffensively pleasant..”
by Kevin Jagernauth [The Palylist]

RUST & BONE :

“..though unabashedly melodramatic, "Rust and Bone" resists many of the pretty comforts of the genre..”
by Peter Debruge [Variety]